SI
Integration Index
โ† Back to rankings
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

Birmingham

United Kingdom ยท Transport for West Midlands (TfWM), part of West Midlands Combined Authority (WMCA)

Birmingham has a coordinating PTA (TfWM) and the Swift smartcard for bus/tram/some rail, but decades of bus deregulation have left a fragmented multi-operator network with limited contactless EMV, no timed-transfer planning, and inter-station transfers requiring street-level walks. Major reform is underway โ€” bus franchising by 2029, rail PAYG pilot, contactless capping project, and Eastside Metro extension โ€” but as of 2026 integration sits below Western European norms.

Integration Index
44.7/100

How integrated public transport is โ€” quantitative reach and qualitative interchange combined

Car-free liveability
37.4/100

How easy it is to get around without a car. A separate measure, reported alongside the index.

Equity
50.0/100

How evenly distributed transit access is across the city

Physical Interchange
5.3/10

Fragmented station spacing forces passengers onto exposed street-level transfers between three rail terminals and tram services, despite New Street's modern facilities and ongoing active travel improvements.

?
  • Signage6/10
  • Mode distance4/10
  • Physical experience6/10
Ticketing & Fares
5.0/10

Swift smartcard and nNetwork tickets enable multimodal travel across bus, tram, and some rail, but fragmented operator coverage and absent contactless capping mean interchange penalties persist for many mode combinations.

?
  • Single platform / contactless4/10
  • Interchange penalty absence5/10
  • Multimodal products6/10
Digital Information
6.0/10

TfWM app with Citymapper-powered journey planner covers all modes plus bike/car hire, and Google/Citymapper/Apple Maps all work, but user reviews flag patchy real-time bus data and multiple competing operator apps.

System Integration
3.7/10

Fragmented multi-operator ownership prevents coordinated timetables and unified ticketing, leaving micro-mobility outside Swift fare integration despite appearing in journey planning.

?
  • Timed connections3/10
  • Off-peak integration5/10
  • MaaS reach3/10

City Profile

Population
1,144,919
2021
Car Ownership
380.0/1k
2021
16% below EU avg
GDP per Capita
โ‚ฌ39,195EUR
2022
27% below EU avg

Accessibility Map

Loading mapโ€ฆ

Compare with another city

๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Zรผrich๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Bern๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Munich๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Basel๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡บ Luxembourg๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Frankfurt๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Oslo๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Copenhagen๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Nuremberg๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Geneva๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น Vienna๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Hannover๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Utrecht๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ The Hague๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Tampere๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Prague๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Eindhoven๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Dresden๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Trondheim๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Stuttgart๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Dรผsseldorf๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Cologne๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Hamburg๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Amsterdam๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ช Tallinn๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Warsaw๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Strasbourg๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ ลรณdลบ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Bratislava๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Rotterdam๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Paris๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Berlin๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Turku๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Bologna๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง London๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Aarhus๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Katowice๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡บ Budapest๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Edinburgh๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Bergen๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Leipzig๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฌ Sofia๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ช Tartu๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด Cluj-Napoca๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Bremen๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Barcelona๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Madrid๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Liรจge๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Helsinki๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Milan๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด Timiศ™oara๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Ghent๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น Linz๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Bilbao๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Antwerp๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Brno๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Lyon๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡น Vilnius๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Malmรถ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Liverpool๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Manchester๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Nantes๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Porto๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ป Riga๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Stockholm๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช Dublin๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Bordeaux๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Toulouse๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Cardiff๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Zaragoza๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Wrocล‚aw๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Ljubljana๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Brussels๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Lille๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Sheffield๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ท Zagreb๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Gothenburg๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Valencia๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Genoa๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Turin๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Marseille๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Glasgow๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Lisbon๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Krakรณw๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Gdaล„sk๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Leeds๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Nice๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Mรกlaga๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Poznaล„๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Rome๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Seville๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Bristol๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡พ Nicosia๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Florence๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Naples๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด Bucharest