SI
Integration Index
โ† Back to rankings
๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด

Cluj-Napoca

Romania ยท Compania de Transport Public Cluj-Napoca SA (CTP Cluj-Napoca)

Cluj-Napoca offers strong single-operator integration across urban and metropolitan bus/tram/trolleybus modes via CTP, with EMV contactless and unified passes plus the unique 'Vinerea Verde' free-Friday policy. However, rail, bike-share and future metro remain on separate systems with no Taktfahrplan or umbrella PTA, and physical interchange quality is mid-tier pending station modernisation.

Integration Index
54.2/100

How integrated public transport is โ€” quantitative reach and qualitative interchange combined

Car-free liveability
40.7/100

How easy it is to get around without a car. A separate measure, reported alongside the index.

Equity
63.3/100

How evenly distributed transit access is across the city

Physical Interchange
5.3/10

Same-square multimodal interchange at Piaศ›a Gฤƒrii is undermined by inaccurate signage, road-crossing barriers, and crowded conditions exacerbated by an unmodernised station under renovation until 2026.

?
  • Signage5/10
  • Mode distance6/10
  • Physical experience5/10
Ticketing & Fares
6.3/10

Contactless EMV and mobile payments work seamlessly across CTP urban and metropolitan transit, but rail and bike-sharing remain outside the unified ticketing system, limiting true multimodal integration.

?
  • Single platform / contactless7/10
  • Interchange penalty absence6/10
  • Multimodal products6/10
Digital Information
7.0/10

Tranzy app provides official real-time GPS tracking, Moovit and Google Maps offer multimodal coverage, and Tranzy even integrates ClujBike availability; Apple Maps is weaker.

System Integration
3.7/10

Transit lacks formal timetable coordination between bus and rail despite shared fares within urban transit, while bike-sharing remains outside fare integration and MaaS planning tools offer only partial coverage.

?
  • Timed connections3/10
  • Off-peak integration5/10
  • MaaS reach3/10

City Profile

Population
324,960
2018
GDP per Capita
โ‚ฌ27,000EUR
2024
50% below EU avg

Accessibility Map

Loading mapโ€ฆ

Compare with another city

๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Zรผrich๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Bern๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Munich๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Basel๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡บ Luxembourg๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Frankfurt๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Oslo๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Copenhagen๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Nuremberg๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Geneva๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น Vienna๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Hannover๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Utrecht๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ The Hague๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Tampere๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Prague๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Eindhoven๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Dresden๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Trondheim๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Stuttgart๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Dรผsseldorf๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Cologne๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Hamburg๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Amsterdam๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ช Tallinn๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Warsaw๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Strasbourg๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ ลรณdลบ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Bratislava๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Rotterdam๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Paris๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Berlin๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Turku๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Bologna๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง London๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Aarhus๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Katowice๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡บ Budapest๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Edinburgh๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Bergen๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Leipzig๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฌ Sofia๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ช Tartu๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Bremen๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Barcelona๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Madrid๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Liรจge๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Helsinki๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Milan๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด Timiศ™oara๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Ghent๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น Linz๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Bilbao๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Antwerp๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Brno๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Lyon๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡น Vilnius๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Malmรถ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Liverpool๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Manchester๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Nantes๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Porto๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ป Riga๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Stockholm๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช Dublin๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Bordeaux๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Toulouse๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Cardiff๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Zaragoza๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Wrocล‚aw๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Ljubljana๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Brussels๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Lille๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Birmingham๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Sheffield๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ท Zagreb๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Gothenburg๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Valencia๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Genoa๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Turin๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Marseille๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Glasgow๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Lisbon๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Krakรณw๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Gdaล„sk๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Leeds๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Nice๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Mรกlaga๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Poznaล„๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Rome๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Seville๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Bristol๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡พ Nicosia๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Florence๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Naples๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด Bucharest