SI
Integration Index
โ† Back to rankings
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

Florence

Italy ยท Autolinee Toscane (AT) operates buses regionally; GEST operates the tram โ€” both within the RATP/Keolis group. No overarching metropolitan PTA covers all modes including rail.

Florence offers solid bus-tram fare integration with contactless EMV and a unified 90-minute urban ticket, supported by new interchange hubs and a high-frequency tram network, but integration breaks down between urban and suburban networks, with national rail, and with shared mobility. The historic centre's aggressive ZTL strongly discourages driving, reinforcing the public transport system despite its fragmentation.

Integration Index
37.0/100

How integrated public transport is โ€” quantitative reach and qualitative interchange combined

Car-free liveability
18.3/100

How easy it is to get around without a car. A separate measure, reported alongside the index.

Equity
50.0/100

How evenly distributed transit access is across the city

Physical Interchange
5.0/10

Functional modern tram hubs and excellent airport-terminal connections are undermined by fragmented wayfinding across scattered bus stops and documented crowding on core tram lines near the central station.

?
  • Signage5/10
  • Mode distance5/10
  • Physical experience5/10
Ticketing & Fares
5.3/10

Contactless payment integrates urban buses and trams with penalty-free transfers within 90 minutes, but regional rail, suburban services, and bike-share remain fragmented from this system.

?
  • Single platform / contactless5/10
  • Interchange penalty absence6/10
  • Multimodal products5/10
Digital Information
6.0/10

Official AT app offers journey planning, real-time bus tracking, and ticketing but has UX complaints; Moovit and Google Maps provide strong third-party coverage, though rail and bike-share remain in separate apps.

System Integration
4.0/10

High tram frequencies obviate formal schedule coordination on core routes, but fragmented evening bus service, app silos for bike-share, and the planned T1 suspension undermine system-wide integration.

?
  • Timed connections4/10
  • Off-peak integration5/10
  • MaaS reach3/10

City Profile

Population
564,080
2025
Car Ownership
471.6/1k
2024
4% above EU avg
GDP per Capita
โ‚ฌ46,700EUR
2023
13% below EU avg

Accessibility Map

Loading mapโ€ฆ

Compare with another city

๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Zรผrich๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Bern๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Munich๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Basel๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡บ Luxembourg๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Frankfurt๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Oslo๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Copenhagen๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Nuremberg๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Geneva๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น Vienna๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Hannover๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Utrecht๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ The Hague๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Tampere๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Prague๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Eindhoven๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Dresden๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Trondheim๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Stuttgart๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Dรผsseldorf๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Cologne๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Hamburg๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Amsterdam๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ช Tallinn๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Warsaw๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Strasbourg๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ ลรณdลบ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Bratislava๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Rotterdam๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Paris๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Berlin๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Turku๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Bologna๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง London๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Aarhus๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Katowice๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡บ Budapest๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Edinburgh๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Bergen๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Leipzig๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฌ Sofia๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ช Tartu๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด Cluj-Napoca๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Bremen๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Barcelona๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Madrid๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Liรจge๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Helsinki๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Milan๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด Timiศ™oara๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Ghent๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น Linz๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Bilbao๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Antwerp๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Brno๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Lyon๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡น Vilnius๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Malmรถ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Liverpool๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Manchester๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Nantes๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Porto๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ป Riga๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Stockholm๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช Dublin๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Bordeaux๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Toulouse๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Cardiff๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Zaragoza๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Wrocล‚aw๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Ljubljana๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Brussels๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Lille๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Birmingham๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Sheffield๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ท Zagreb๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Gothenburg๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Valencia๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Genoa๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Turin๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Marseille๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Glasgow๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Lisbon๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Krakรณw๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Gdaล„sk๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Leeds๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Nice๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Mรกlaga๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Poznaล„๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Rome๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Seville๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Bristol๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡พ Nicosia๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Naples๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด Bucharest