SI
Integration Index
โ† Back to rankings
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

Liverpool

United Kingdom ยท Merseytravel (executive body of the Liverpool City Region Combined Authority)

Liverpool has a strong rail backbone via the high-frequency Merseyrail concession with newly launched contactless EMV, plus a longstanding MetroCard smartcard usable across modes, but bus services remain deregulated and fragmented, multimodal capping does not exist, and key interchanges between rail, bus and ferry are not co-located. Major reforms are underway โ€” bus franchising rolling out 2026-2027 and a unified ticketing vision โ€” but as of now integration is partial and transitional.

Integration Index
48.0/100

How integrated public transport is โ€” quantitative reach and qualitative interchange combined

Car-free liveability
40.5/100

How easy it is to get around without a car. A separate measure, reported alongside the index.

Equity
50.0/100

How evenly distributed transit access is across the city

Physical Interchange
5.3/10

Rail and bus modes remain functionally separated across multiple disconnected terminals, forcing pedestrians on 4-20 minute exposed walks despite modern facilities at individual stations.

?
  • Signage6/10
  • Mode distance4/10
  • Physical experience6/10
Ticketing & Fares
5.0/10

Multimodal Saveaway day tickets cover bus, rail and ferry but only off-peak, while contactless payment remains fragmented across modes and no integrated fare-capping exists for weekday commuters.

?
  • Single platform / contactless5/10
  • Interchange penalty absence4/10
  • Multimodal products6/10
Digital Information
6.0/10

The Merseytravel app provides multimodal journey planning with real-time where available, and Google/Citymapper cover the city, but real-time bus information at stops is only being trialled via QR codes at 600 of 6,200 stops.

System Integration
3.7/10

Clock-face rail services enable reliable timed connections, but deregulated bus operations prevent coordinated timetabling, fragmented evening coverage undermines off-peak integration, and micromobility operates disconnected from fare and journey-planning systems.

?
  • Timed connections4/10
  • Off-peak integration4/10
  • MaaS reach3/10

City Profile

Population
486,100
2021
Car Ownership
360.0/1k
2021
20% below EU avg
GDP per Capita
โ‚ฌ37,440EUR
2022
30% below EU avg

Accessibility Map

Loading mapโ€ฆ

Compare with another city

๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Zรผrich๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Bern๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Munich๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Basel๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡บ Luxembourg๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Frankfurt๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Oslo๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Copenhagen๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Nuremberg๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Geneva๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น Vienna๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Hannover๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Utrecht๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ The Hague๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Tampere๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Prague๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Eindhoven๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Dresden๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Trondheim๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Stuttgart๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Dรผsseldorf๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Cologne๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Hamburg๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Amsterdam๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ช Tallinn๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Warsaw๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Strasbourg๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ ลรณdลบ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Bratislava๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Rotterdam๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Paris๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Berlin๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Turku๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Bologna๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง London๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Aarhus๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Katowice๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡บ Budapest๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Edinburgh๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Bergen๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Leipzig๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฌ Sofia๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ช Tartu๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด Cluj-Napoca๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Bremen๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Barcelona๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Madrid๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Liรจge๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Helsinki๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Milan๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด Timiศ™oara๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Ghent๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น Linz๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Bilbao๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Antwerp๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Brno๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Lyon๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡น Vilnius๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Malmรถ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Manchester๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Nantes๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Porto๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ป Riga๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Stockholm๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช Dublin๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Bordeaux๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Toulouse๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Cardiff๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Zaragoza๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Wrocล‚aw๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Ljubljana๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Brussels๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Lille๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Birmingham๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Sheffield๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ท Zagreb๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Gothenburg๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Valencia๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Genoa๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Turin๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Marseille๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Glasgow๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Lisbon๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Krakรณw๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Gdaล„sk๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Leeds๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Nice๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Mรกlaga๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Poznaล„๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Rome๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Seville๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Bristol๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡พ Nicosia๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Florence๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Naples๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด Bucharest